<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>roadtrafficlaw.com &#187; breathalyser</title>
	<atom:link href="http://roadtrafficlaw.com/road-traffic-law-scotland/tag/breathalyser/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://roadtrafficlaw.com/road-traffic-law-scotland</link>
	<description>Road Traffic Law In Scotland</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Apr 2010 12:21:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Drink Driving Scotland Mistake 3: The Breath Test</title>
		<link>http://roadtrafficlaw.com/road-traffic-law-scotland/drink-driving-scotland-mistake-3-the-breath-test</link>
		<comments>http://roadtrafficlaw.com/road-traffic-law-scotland/drink-driving-scotland-mistake-3-the-breath-test#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:26:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[drink driving scotland]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breath test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[breathalyser]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drink drive lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[drunk driving scotland]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://roadtrafficlaw.com/road-traffic-law-scotland/?p=55</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Drink Driving Scotland, Mistake 3 - 3 Assuming the Breat Analysis Machine is Infallible
Even the Space Shuttle wasn&#8217;t  					infallible. My motto tends to be &#8220;Don&#8217;t trust technology&#8221;-I can&#8217;t think of a machine that  					hasn&#8217;t broken down sometime! All the defence require to do  					is show the Sheriff that there is room for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft" title="Drink Driving Scotland" src="http://roadtrafficlaw.com/Cop_Intoximeter.jpg" alt="" width="200" height="149" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Drink Driving Scotland, Mistake 3 -<span style="color: #000000;"> </span>3 Assuming the Breat Analysis Machine is Infallible<span style="color: #ffffff; font-size: x-small;"></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Even the Space Shuttle wasn&#8217;t  					infallible. My motto tends to be &#8220;Don&#8217;t trust technology&#8221;-I can&#8217;t think of a machine that  					hasn&#8217;t broken down sometime! All the defence require to do  					is show the Sheriff that there is room for a &#8220;reasonable  					doubt&#8221; regarding the reliability of the machine and your  					licence is saved.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Laymen and even lawyers are  					sometimes guilty of failing to read the piece of legislation  					that the case relates too. The law in relation to drink  					driving cases, of course requires to be fully understood  					however all the statutes and the  					regulations governing the use of technical equipment  					requires to be read and understood. The lawyer needs to know  					what is and what is not admissible evidence-This is not  					always easy and again experience tends to be the key to  					success.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Those that donâ€™t know the laws  					and regulations donâ€™t realise that violations of the rules  					introduceÂ  into evidence matters that can be suppressed  					from the trial on the grounds of fairness to the accused.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Since the intoximeter devices are &#8220;type  					approved&#8221; there is now a statutory presumption that they are  					reliable and that they work properly. Therefore to defend  					such a case you need to get copies of the various logs,  					maintenance records, printout of sample taken etc. This is  					not easy as the Crown will refuse to provide these documents  					if they consider that this is a &#8220;Fishing expedition&#8221; where  					the defence are just looking for some kind of get out!</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">My own view is that we should be  					entitled to obtain all such documents, even if it were a so  					called &#8220;fishing expedition&#8221; since this is how we the public  					have any chance of establishing that the correct procedures  					and proper working equipment has been used. Sadly, it  					has been known forÂ  lawyers and unrepresented parties  					to just have the complaint and the arrest report, this again  					emphasises the need for an experienced solicitor forÂ <span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong> <a title="Drink Driving Scotland" href="http://www.roadtrafficlaw.com/Ask_A_Lawyer.htm" target="_self">drink driving in Scotland</a></strong></span> be instructed from  					the outset.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">We offer a <strong>free</strong> service where you can ask <strong>specialist road traffic lawyer</strong> any question in confidence on any aspect of <strong><a title="Drink Driving Scotland" href="http://www.roadtrafficlaw.com/Ask_A_Lawyer.htm" target="_self">drink driving in Scotland</a></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://roadtrafficlaw.com/road-traffic-law-scotland/drink-driving-scotland-mistake-3-the-breath-test/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
